Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 05:19

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Night Owls More Impulsive Than Morning Larks - Neuroscience News
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Russia can stop this any time.
Thank you.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Do countries with free health care generally have co-pays or deductibles to discourage use?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
SEC clears Trump Media filing, opening door to multi-billion-dollar Bitcoin buy - The Block
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Do you find Anushka Sen attractive?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
What’s next?
How PTSD Disrupts Brain Cell Communication - Neuroscience News
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years:
Opinion: The secret to a longer life could be this old-fashioned English breakfast - MarketWatch
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
PS5 shooter goes from 5 players to bestseller after devs defend game - Polygon
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.